π©πΎββοΈ CPT Code 30905 β Control of Posterior Nasal Hemorrhage, Initial
Official Full Descriptor
Control nasal hemorrhage, posterior, with posterior nasal packs and/or cautery, any method; initial
CPT 30905 captures the first treatment session for a posterior nasal hemorrhage using posterior nasal packing, cautery, or any combination of these methods. The term βinitialβ is a critical element of the descriptor β it designates this as the first encounter at which posterior packing or cautery is applied for a posterior bleed. If the same patient requires a return visit for reapplication of posterior packing due to treatment failure or rebleeding, report CPT 30906 (subsequent) instead. The phrase βany methodβ means that the specific technique used β bilateral gauze posterior packs, double-balloon catheter (Epistat), single-balloon device (Rapid Rhino posterior), endoscopically-guided posterior cautery prior to formal endoscopic ligation β does not alter the code, provided no endoscope is used as the active therapeutic instrument.
Code Classification & Position in the CPT Hierarchy
Respiratory System (10000-32999)
βββ Nose (30000-30999)
βββ Other Procedures on the Nose (30901-30999)
βββ Control of Nasal Hemorrhage (30901-30906)
βββ 30901 Anterior, simple (limited cautery and/or packing)
βββ 30903 Anterior, complex (extensive cautery and/or packing)
βββ 30905 Posterior, initial (packs and/or cautery) β TARGET
βββ 30906 Posterior, subsequent (packs and/or cautery)
Full Epistaxis Control Code Family β Complete Reference
| CPT | Descriptor | Location | Complexity | wRVU (approx.) | Global |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 30901 | Control nasal hemorrhage, anterior, simple | Anterior | Simple | ~1.31 | 0 days |
| 30903 | Control nasal hemorrhage, anterior, complex | Anterior | Complex | ~2.42 | 0 days |
| 30905 | Control nasal hemorrhage, posterior; initial | Posterior | First treatment | ~3.01 | 0 days |
| 30906 | Control nasal hemorrhage, posterior; subsequent | Posterior | Repeat treatment | ~3.88 | 0 days |
Escalation Procedures β Separately Reportable When 30905 Fails
| CPT | Description | Context | wRVU (approx.) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 31238 | Nasal/sinus endoscopy, surgical; with control of nasal hemorrhage | Endoscope is active treatment instrument (not just for visualization) | ~4.84 |
| 31241 | Nasal/sinus endoscopy, surgical; with ligation of sphenopalatine artery(ies) (TESPAL) | Endoscopic sphenopalatine artery ligation | ~9.53 |
| 30920 | Ligation, internal maxillary artery; transantral approach | Open/endoscopic arterial ligation β internal maxillary | ~8.70 |
| 61626 | Transcatheter occlusion/embolization, non-CNS; head or neck | Interventional radiology embolization for refractory epistaxis | ~12.00+ |
Tip
Key escalation principle: When posterior packing (30905) fails and the patient requires surgical or endoscopic intervention, the appropriate escalation code (31238, 31241, 30920) is reported. CPT 30905 and the escalation code may both be reported if packing was initially applied at one encounter and the definitive surgical intervention occurs at a separate, distinct encounter. If both occur at the same session, the higher-value surgical code is generally reported, as the packing is integral to the surgical procedure. Verify NCCI edits and payer policy when reporting same-session packing plus endoscopic intervention.
Procedure Description β What CPT 30905 Represents
Clinical Definition
CPT 30905 describes the first intervention performed to control a posterior nasal hemorrhage using bilateral posterior nasal packing, cautery of the posterior nasal cavity, or a combination of these techniques. It is the most clinically significant code in the epistaxis family because posterior nasal hemorrhage β unlike anterior epistaxis β is associated with higher blood loss, higher rates of inpatient admission, greater risk of airway compromise, and a more complex patient population (older, more comorbidities, more frequent anticoagulation).
Posterior epistaxis most commonly arises from the sphenopalatine artery (SPA) or its branches, particularly at the sphenopalatine foramen on the lateral nasal wall and the posterior nasal septum at the posterior nasal septumβs vascular anastomoses. The SPA is the terminal branch of the internal maxillary artery, itself a branch of the external carotid artery. Less commonly, posterior epistaxis arises from the posterior ethmoidal artery (a branch of the ophthalmic artery from the internal carotid system), which is important because embolization does not address ICA-derived vessels, making surgical ligation the only option for posterior ethmoidal artery bleeds.
Anatomy β Posterior vs. Anterior Epistaxis
Posterior Epistaxis:
- Originates in the posterior nasal cavity, at or behind the posterior end of the inferior turbinate, from branches of the sphenopalatine artery or posterior ethmoidal artery
- Blood flows posteriorly into the nasopharynx; patient may swallow blood, present with hematemesis, or have blood visible in the posterior pharynx
- Not visible on anterior rhinoscopy or speculum exam; typically only identifiable with nasopharyngoscopy or nasal endoscopy
- Represents approximately 5-10% of all epistaxis cases but accounts for a disproportionately high share of hospitalizations, transfusions, and intensive interventions
- More common in older adults with hypertension, atherosclerosis, and anticoagulation
Clinical Features Distinguishing Posterior from Anterior Epistaxis:
- Blood drains down the posterior pharynx rather than from the nasal aperture
- Anterior packing alone does not control bleeding (blood continues to flow posteriorly or into the pharynx despite anterior packing)
- Patient may gag on blood, present with hematemesis, or require oral suctioning
- Bilateral blood tracking even when unilateral packing placed
- BP is often significantly elevated at presentation
- In elderly patients on anticoagulation, posterior bleeds are associated with Hgb drops requiring transfusion in a significant minority of cases
The Posterior Nasal Space: Anatomical Boundaries of Packing
Posterior nasal packing works by filling the choana β the posterior aperture of the nasal cavity where it communicates with the nasopharynx β to create a posterior tamponade stop that prevents blood from flowing posteriorly while anterior pressure is simultaneously applied through anterior packing. The posterior pack provides the posterior wall against which the anterior pack can compress.
Classic four-layer anatomy relevant to posterior packing:
- Nasal cavity proper (anterior to choana)
- Choanal aperture (the posterior opening)
- Nasopharynx (behind the choana, above the soft palate)
- The posterior nasal septum vasculature (common posterior bleed origin)
Methods β βAny Methodβ Under 30905
All of the following techniques fall under CPT 30905 when used for initial posterior epistaxis control. The specific device or technique does not change the code:
Formal Posterior Gauze Packs (Traditional / Classic Method):
- Rolled petroleum gauze (Vaseline-impregnated) formed into a dense oblong pack, delivered into the posterior choana via the mouth using a posterior pack catheter or suture tie
- Historically the most common method; highly effective but uncomfortable, associated with significant morbidity (hypoxemia, pressure necrosis, sinusitis, otitis media, pain)
- Requires string anteriorly through the nose and posteriorly through the mouth for secure fixation; string is taped to the patientβs nose
- Virtually replaced in modern practice by balloon devices but remains relevant for complex anatomy
Balloon Tamponade Devices β Dual-Balloon (Epistat / Brighton Balloon):
- Double-balloon catheter (anterior + posterior balloon on a single shaft)
- Posterior balloon is inflated in the nasopharynx (10-20 mL water or saline) to act as the posterior stop, then the anterior nasal balloon is inflated (30-45 mL) to fill the nasal cavity
- Most widely used method in emergency and inpatient settings
- Key: The posterior balloon must be inflated first, then the anterior balloon; inflating the anterior balloon first without posterior stop risks posterior balloon displacement
Posterior-Only Packs with Separate Anterior Gauze:
- Some providers prefer to place a traditional gauze posterior pack in combination with a separate Merocel tampon anteriorly for independent pressure control
Foley Catheter as Posterior Pack:
- A 14-16 French Foley catheter introduced transnasally into the nasopharynx, balloon inflated (5-10 mL), and pulled forward to sit at the posterior choanal opening
- Improvised technique used when formal posterior packing devices are unavailable; widely used in resource-limited or high-acuity settings
- Effective and inexpensive; shares the same CPT code (30905) as formal posterior packing devices
Posterior Cautery (Limited Endoscopic or Blind):
- In select cases where the posterior bleeding site is visible via nasal endoscopy, direct cautery may be applied to the bleeding vessel before formal posterior packing
- If cautery alone is used (without leaving a pack) but the bleeding is confirmed posterior and the cautery is applied in the posterior nasal cavity, 30905 remains appropriate
- If the nasal endoscope is the active treatment instrument (used to guide cautery directly), consider whether 31238 is more appropriate β see NCCI section
Topical Hemostatic Agents:
- Tranexamic acid (TXA) intranasal spray or soaked pledgets β increasingly used as adjunct; does not replace packing but may reduce pack size needed
- FloSeal/Surgiflo with or without packing β placed in the posterior nasal cavity or at the site of bleeding identified endoscopically
- These agents fall under βany methodβ and do not change the code to something other than 30905
Includes
The following components are bundled into 30905 and cannot be separately billed:
- Application of posterior nasal pack (any type: gauze, balloon, Foley catheter) as the primary hemostatic mechanism
- Placement of anterior nasal packing when done as part of the same session to provide anterior tamponade support for the posterior pack β the anterior packing is integral and subsumed by 30905
- Topical vasoconstrictor/anesthetic application prior to packing (e.g., lidocaine + oxymetazoline pledgets)
- Oral/nasal suctioning to clear blood prior to pack placement
- Diagnostic visualization of the posterior nasal space via nasal speculum or rigid nasal endoscope when used solely for visualization of the bleeding site before applying the posterior pack
- Posterior pack securing technique (strings, suture ties, taping to the nose)
- Foley catheter balloon inflation and positioning (subsumed into 30905 β no separate catheter placement code applies)
- Patient monitoring and vital sign management during the procedure
- Post-procedure care instructions within the 0-day global period
- Anterior epistaxis treatment (30901/30903) performed at the same session β anterior codes are bundled into 30905 by NCCI; see Excludes section
Excludes / Do Not Report Together
NCCI Bundles β Critical Rules for 30905
| Code | Description | Relationship to 30905 | Modifier Override |
|---|---|---|---|
| 30901 | Anterior epistaxis, simple | Bundled INTO 30905 β if both anterior and posterior treatment performed same session, report only 30905 | None β cannot override |
| 30903 | Anterior epistaxis, complex | Bundled INTO 30905 β same session; 30905 is more comprehensive | None β cannot override |
| 30906 | Posterior epistaxis, subsequent | Mutually exclusive with 30905 at same encounter β 30905 = initial; 30906 = repeat. Cannot bill both at same encounter | None |
Note
Plain Language Rule: If anterior AND posterior packing/cautery are performed at the same session for the same patient, report only 30905. The anterior component is wholly included. This is one of the most violated rules in epistaxis coding.
30905 vs. 31238 β The Endoscope Decision Point
This is the single most nuanced distinction in posterior epistaxis coding:
| Scenario | Correct Code |
|---|---|
| Nasal endoscope used to visualize the posterior bleeding site, then posterior pack placed by any method | 30905 β endoscope is just a visualization tool |
| Nasal endoscope used to actively cauterize the bleeding vessel at the posterior lateral nasal wall (e.g., bipolar cautery through endoscope, no pack placed afterward, or pack placed only to confirm hemostasis) | 31238 β endoscope is the active treatment instrument |
| Diagnostic endoscopy performed in clinic earlier the same day, then posterior packing in ED | 31231 (diagnostic scope) + 30905 (packing) with appropriate modifiers and separate encounter documentation β verify payer |
Tip
When in doubt: Ask the provider whether the endoscope was used to actually deliver the treatment (31238) or merely to see the bleeding site before applying a separate treatment (30905). This single question determines correct code selection.
30905 vs. 31241 (TESPAL β Transnasal Endoscopic Sphenopalatine Artery Ligation)
| Scenario | Code |
|---|---|
| Posterior packing placed as initial measure | 30905 |
| Posterior packing failed; patient taken to OR for endoscopic SPA ligation | 31241 (separately at a different encounter/OR session) |
| Posterior packing AND endoscopic SPA ligation performed at same session | Typically only 31241 β the packing is integral to the surgical field preparation and management; however, some payers may allow both with modifier -59/XS if the packing was placed at a distinct prior encounter; verify payer policy |
Do Not Append Modifier -50 to 30905
CPT 30905 is inherently bilateral. Posterior nasal packing tamponades the choana and posterior nasal space in a fashion that provides bilateral tamponade by anatomical necessity. The concept of unilateral posterior packing does not apply to the classical posterior epistaxis packing techniques. Never append modifier -50 to 30905 or 30906. This is a specific and commonly seen coding error when providers migrate assumptions from anterior codes (where -50 IS applicable for bilateral anterior treatment) to posterior codes.
Additional Codes That Should NOT Be Reported with 30905
| Code | Description | Reason |
|---|---|---|
| 31231 | Diagnostic nasal endoscopy | If used purely for visualization before packing, it is bundled into 30905; report 31231 separately only if performed at a distinct prior encounter |
| 99213-99215 without -25 | E&M on same day | E&M is separately reportable but REQUIRES modifier -25; without -25, it will be denied |
HCC (Hierarchical Condition Category)
| Field | Detail |
|---|---|
| HCC Mapped | No β CPT 30905 is a procedure code; procedure codes do not carry HCC weight |
| HCC via Diagnosis | The ICD-10-CM diagnoses paired with 30905 may carry HCC significance. R04.0 (Epistaxis) itself is not an HCC code. However, underlying etiologies that are HCC-relevant include: C32.0-C32.9 (laryngeal/sinonasal malignancy), C30.0 (nasal cavity malignancy), D65 (DIC), D66-D67 (hemophilia A/B), D68.x (coagulopathy), I78.0 (HHT/Osler-Weber-Rendu disease), and hematologic malignancies (C81-C96). Always code the confirmed underlying cause β not just R04.0 β to capture HCC risk where applicable. |
| High-Value HCC Pairing | When posterior epistaxis in an elderly Medicare patient is secondary to a known malignancy or hemophilia, coding the underlying diagnosis alongside R04.0 generates HCC credit and more accurately reflects the patientβs true risk burden. |
wRVU (Work Relative Value Units)
| Component | Facility Setting | Non-Facility Setting |
|---|---|---|
| Work RVU (wRVU) | ~3.01 | ~3.01 |
| Practice Expense RVU | ~2.19 | ~4.89 |
| Malpractice RVU | ~0.12 | ~0.12 |
| Total RVU (facility) | ~5.32 | ~8.02 (non-facility) |
Approximate Medicare National Payment:
- Facility (ED, hospital): ~32.35)
- Non-facility (office): ~32.35)
Epistaxis Code Family wRVU Comparison:
| CPT | Description | wRVU (approx.) |
|---|---|---|
| 30901 | Anterior, simple | ~1.31 |
| 30903 | Anterior, complex | ~2.42 |
| 31231 | Diagnostic nasal endoscopy | ~1.43 |
| 30905 | Posterior, initial | ~3.01 |
| 30906 | Posterior, subsequent | ~3.88 |
| 31238 | Endoscopic hemorrhage control | ~4.84 |
| 31241 | TESPAL (SPA ligation) | ~9.53 |
| 30920 | Internal maxillary artery ligation | ~8.70 |
Note
30906 (subsequent) carries a higher wRVU than 30905 (initial) despite being a repeat procedure. This reflects the AMA RUCβs recognition that a second posterior epistaxis treatment indicates treatment failure, requiring more clinical judgment, greater physician work to assess the situation, and often more complex re-intervention. This counterintuitive relationship is worth explaining to providers who may question why the βsecondβ procedure pays more.
Always verify against the current yearβs CMS MPFS Addendum B. Values are subject to annual revision.
Assistant Payable
| Field | Detail |
|---|---|
| Medicare Assistant-at-Surgery | No β Not Payable |
| Medicare Indicator | 0 β assistant not payable under any circumstance |
| Rationale | CPT 30905 is performed at the bedside, in the ED, or in a procedure room by a single physician. Posterior nasal packing, Foley catheter balloon placement, and bedside posterior cautery are single-operator procedures. No surgical assistant has a defined clinical role. |
| Co-surgeon | Not applicable |
| Commercial Payers | No commercial payer reimburses an assistant for posterior nasal packing. |
| Anesthesia Note | 30905 does not require general or MAC anesthesia in standard practice. Procedural sedation may be used in select patients (anxious, pediatric, or combative patients). Anesthesia, if provided, would be a separate service under the anesthesiologistβs billing. |
Global Period β 0 Days
All four epistaxis control codes (30901, 30903, 30905, 30906) carry a 0-day global period, confirmed by CMS. This has critical implications for multi-day posterior packing management, which is one of the most common inpatient epistaxis scenarios.
What 0-Day Global Period Means for Posterior Epistaxis
The 0-day global period means:
- No pre-operative visit is bundled β a separately documented E&M on the day of the procedure is separately billable with modifier -25
- No post-operative care is bundled β E&M visits on the following days of an inpatient stay are separately billable without any modifier (the global period has already closed on the day of the procedure)
- Same-day re-packing: If posterior packing is placed, re-examined, or replaced on the same day by the same physician, a second 30905 or 30906 may be reported with modifier -76 (repeat procedure, same physician)
- Next-day visits: Because the global period is 0 days, subsequent hospital visits (99231-99233) or subsequent pack-related interventions on the following days do not require a modifier to indicate they are outside the global period β they are already outside it
Multi-Day Inpatient Packing Scenario
Patients admitted with posterior packs in place for 48-72 hours (a common management strategy) can have each clinical encounter during the admission separately billed:
| Day | Event | Billable Code |
|---|---|---|
| Day 1 | Posterior pack placed | 30905 |
| Day 1 continued | Separate, documented E&M assessing medical comorbidities | 99232-25 or 99232 (if a truly distinct E&M) |
| Day 2 | Subsequent inpatient visit, monitoring pack and Oβ | 99231-99233 (inpatient subsequent care E&M) |
| Day 2 | Pack repositioned due to displacement | 30906 (subsequent) |
| Day 3 | Pack removal β ENT documents exam | 99231 or 99232 |
| Day 3 | New pack placed due to rebleed | 30906 (subsequent) |
Note
The 0-day global is the single most important billing concept for posterior epistaxis in the inpatient setting. Many coders and providers incorrectly assume there is a bundled post-operative period and do not bill the daily hospital management or subsequent pack-related procedures. This results in significant lost revenue that is entirely appropriate to capture.
Site of Service (SOS)
| Setting | Applicable | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Emergency Department | Yes β most common setting for initial posterior packing | Facility rate applies; physician bills professional component; very common setting for 30905 |
| Hospital Inpatient (Bedside) | Yes β common for admitted patients | Facility rate applies; physician bills separately; multi-day packing scenarios fully separately billable due to 0-day global |
| Hospital Outpatient / HOPD | Yes | Facility bills APC; physician bills professional component |
| Office / Clinic | Rarely β only for mild posterior bleeds in controlled setting with immediate escalation capability | Non-facility rate applies; much higher payment to physician who bears supply costs |
| ICU / MICU | Yes β as inpatient bedside setting | Critical care billing (99291-99292) may also be appropriate if physician spends β₯30 minutes in critical care management; evaluate whether 30905 or critical care is the primary service to bill |
| Ambulatory Surgery Center | Rare | For posterior cautery under endoscopy (31238) rather than simple posterior packing (30905) |
MS-DRG Assignment
Posterior epistaxis requiring inpatient admission is a common ENT-driven hospitalization. The MS-DRG assignment depends on the principal ICD-10-CM diagnosis and any CC/MCC secondary diagnoses.
Primary DRG Family β MDC 03 (Ear, Nose, Mouth and Throat)
When R04.0 (Epistaxis) is the principal diagnosis and no OR-level procedure is performed:
| MS-DRG | Title | CC/MCC |
|---|---|---|
| 153 | Otitis Media and URI with MCC | With MCC |
| 154 | Otitis Media and URI without MCC | Without MCC |
Important DRG Note:
R04.0 (Epistaxis) with posterior packing (30905) typically does not qualify as an OR-level procedure under the IPPS grouper. CPT 30905 maps to a bedside/non-OR procedure type, meaning the admission groups to the medical DRG (153/154) based on the diagnosis alone rather than a surgical DRG. This is a critical inpatient coding and CDI concept β posterior packing alone will not drive an OR-level DRG.
When Posterior Epistaxis Groups to Higher DRGs
| Trigger | MS-DRG Impact |
|---|---|
| Endoscopic hemorrhage control (31238) performed | May qualify as OR procedure; escalates to DRG 579/580/581 (Other ENT OR Procedures) |
| Endoscopic SPA ligation / TESPAL (31241) performed | OR procedure; groups to DRG 579/580/581 |
| Arterial embolization (61626) performed | OR procedure under IR; may group differently depending on principal diagnosis |
| Open arterial ligation (30920) | OR procedure; DRG 579/580/581 or tracheostomy DRG if airway involved |
| Blood transfusion required | Transfusion is not an OR procedure but coagulopathy as secondary diagnosis may function as MCC/CC and elevate DRG tier |
DRG Shift When Etiology Governs Principal Diagnosis
| Principal Diagnosis | MDC | DRG Family |
|---|---|---|
| R04.0 (Epistaxis, idiopathic) | MDC 03 | 153/154 |
| D69.6 (Thrombocytopenia) | MDC 16 | Blood/blood-forming DRGs |
| D65 (DIC) | MDC 16 | Blood DRGs (MCC) |
| C30.0 (Nasal cavity malignancy) | MDC 03 | 146/147/148 (ENT Malignancy) |
| C44.321 (SCC nose) | MDC 03 | 146/147/148 |
| I78.0 (HHT) | MDC 03 | 153/154 |
| I16.1(Hypertensive emergency) | MDC 05 | Circulatory DRGs |
| T45.515A (Adverse effect anticoagulants) | MDC 21 (Injuries/Toxicology) | Poisoning/Toxic Effect DRGs |
CDI Opportunity: When a patient is admitted for severe posterior epistaxis in the setting of a known coagulopathy, malignancy, or hypertensive emergency, the underlying condition should be the principal diagnosis (the condition chiefly responsible for the admission after study). Sequencing epistaxis as principal when the coagulopathy drove the admission results in a lower DRG relative weight. CDI specialists and coders should query providers about which condition was most responsible for the admission to ensure accurate principal diagnosis sequencing.
CC/MCC Status of Secondary Diagnoses Paired with 30905
R04.0 (Epistaxis) itself is not a CC or MCC as a secondary diagnosis. However, the following frequently co-occurring secondary diagnoses may function as CC or MCC and elevate the DRG tier:
| Secondary Diagnosis | CC/MCC Status |
|---|---|
| D65 β DIC | MCC |
| D68.311 β Acquired hemophilia | MCC |
| D66 β Hereditary factor VIII deficiency (Hemophilia A) | CC |
| D67 β Hereditary factor IX deficiency (Hemophilia B) | CC |
| D68.0 β Von Willebrand disease | CC |
| D69.3 β ITP | CC |
| I16.1 β Hypertensive emergency | MCC |
| I16.0 β Hypertensive urgency | CC |
| T45.515A β Adverse effect anticoagulants, initial | CC |
| J96.00 β Acute respiratory failure | MCC |
| N18.4 β CKD stage 4 | CC |
| N18.5 β CKD stage 5 | MCC |
| I50.9 β Heart failure, unspecified | CC |
| E11.649 β T2DM with hypoglycemia without coma | CC |
Note
Accurate identification and coding of these secondary diagnoses not only improves risk adjustment but may shift the DRG from 154 (without MCC) to 153 (with MCC), materially increasing the hospitalβs reimbursement.
Commonly Paired ICD-10-CM Diagnosis Codes
Primary Diagnosis
| ICD-10-CM | Description | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| R04.0 | Epistaxis | Primary code β nosebleed; includes hemorrhage from nose; not a CC or MCC |
Systemic/Vascular Causes
| ICD-10-CM | Description | HCC | CC/MCC |
|---|---|---|---|
| I10 | Essential hypertension | No | Not CC |
| I16.0 | Hypertensive urgency | No | CC |
| I16.1 | Hypertensive emergency | No | MCC |
| I78.0 | Hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (Osler-Weber-Rendu) | No | Not CC |
| I77.1 | Stricture of artery | No | β |
Coagulopathy
| ICD-10-CM | Description | HCC | CC/MCC |
|---|---|---|---|
| D65 | DIC (disseminated intravascular coagulation) | No | MCC |
| D66 | Hereditary factor VIII deficiency (Hemophilia A) | No | CC |
| D67 | Hereditary factor IX deficiency (Hemophilia B) | No | CC |
| D68.0 | Von Willebrand disease | No | CC |
| D68.311 | Acquired hemophilia | No | MCC |
| D68.32 | Hemorrhagic disorder due to extrinsic anticoagulants | No | CC |
| D69.3 | Immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) | No | CC |
| D69.6 | Thrombocytopenia, unspecified | No | CC |
Medication-Related β Adverse Effect Coding
| ICD-10-CM | Description | Sequencing |
|---|---|---|
| T45.515A | Adverse effect of anticoagulants, initial encounter | After principal Dx; drug correctly prescribed and administered |
| T45.525A | Adverse effect of antithrombotic drugs, initial encounter | For antiplatelet agents |
| Z79.01 | Long-term use of anticoagulants | Secondary β ongoing status |
| Z79.02 | Long-term use of antithrombotics | Secondary |
Note
Adverse Effect Sequencing: When posterior epistaxis is caused by correctly prescribed and administered anticoagulant therapy (warfarin, DOAC, heparin), the epistaxis is the manifestation and is coded first (R04.0 as principal if it is the reason for admission), followed by the adverse effect code (T45.515A) and then the underlying condition being treated by the anticoagulant (e.g.,I48.91 β atrial fibrillation). This three-code sequence is required per ICD-10-CM guidelines for adverse effect coding.
Nasal/Sinus Structural Causes
| ICD-10-CM | Description |
|---|---|
| J34.2 | Deviated nasal septum |
| J34.89 | Other specified disorders of nose and nasal sinuses |
| J31.0 | Chronic rhinitis |
Malignancy-Related
| ICD-10-CM | Description | HCC |
|---|---|---|
| C30.0 | Malignant neoplasm of nasal cavity | Yes |
| C31.0 | Malignant neoplasm of maxillary sinus | Yes |
| C31.1 | Malignant neoplasm of ethmoidal sinus | Yes |
| C44.321 | SCC, skin of nose | Yes |
| C79.89 | Secondary malignant neoplasm, other sites | Yes |
| C81-C96 | Hematologic malignancies (leukemia, lymphoma) | Yes |
Trauma
| ICD-10-CM | Description |
|---|---|
| S09.90XA | Unspecified injury of head, initial encounter |
| S09.92XA | Unspecified nasal fracture |
| S02.2XXA | Fracture of nasal bones, initial encounter |
Modifier Considerations for CPT 30905
| Modifier | Usage with 30905 |
|---|---|
| -25 | Required when billing an E&M service on the same date as 30905; the E&M must be separately documented and represent a distinct, significant service beyond the packing |
| -50 | DO NOT USE β 30905 is inherently bilateral; applying modifier -50 is incorrect and will result in overpayment or claim issues |
| -76 | Repeat procedure, same physician, same day β use when posterior packing is re-placed on the same date by the same provider (e.g., pack fell out and was replaced within same calendar day); second unit of 30905 with -76 |
| -77 | Repeat procedure, different physician, same day β use when a second provider replaces the pack on the same date (e.g., ENT places initial pack in ED, hospitalist replaces it later same night) |
| -RT / -LT | Generally not applicable β posterior packing is bilateral by nature; however, some payers request laterality documentation for localized posterior cautery (e.g., endoscopic cautery of posterior septum on one side); verify per payer |
| -59 / -XE | Use to separate a distinct endoscopic procedure (31238) from 30905 if both are performed at distinct anatomical sites or separate encounters; carefully document and verify NCCI |
| -79 | Unrelated procedure during the global period of a different procedure β posterior epistaxis packing occurring during the global period of an unrelated surgical procedure; note that 30905 has a 0-day global itself, so this modifier is only needed in relation to other active global periods |
Packing Removal β Is It Separately Billable?
This is one of the most commonly asked coding questions for posterior epistaxis management and deserves dedicated attention:
Removal of posterior packing that was placed at a prior encounter:
- If the same physician who placed the packing removes it at a follow-up visit, the removal is generally not separately billable unless the encounter involves significant, documented evaluation and management beyond the packing removal itself
- Because 30905 has a 0-day global period, the βglobal periodβ concept does not bundle the removal into the original procedureβs fee β however, Medicare historically does not recognize a separate CPT code for packing removal from the nose
- An E&M (office visit or subsequent hospital care) may be billed for the removal visit if it includes separately documented evaluation, examination, and medical decision-making distinct from the mechanical act of removing the pack
- Removal of packing placed by a different physician at a different facility: E&M is the appropriate billing vehicle; document the clinical encounter clearly
Note
No CPT code specifically covers βnasal pack removalβ β the E&M is the appropriate vehicle for this encounter.
Relationship to 31241 β TESPAL (Transnasal Endoscopic Sphenopalatine Artery Ligation)
CPT 31241 (introduced in 2018) specifically describes endoscopic SPA ligation and is the current gold standard for refractory posterior epistaxis. The relationship between 30905 and 31241 in clinical and coding practice:
| Scenario | Coding |
|---|---|
| Initial posterior packing placed in ED; resolves without further intervention | 30905 only |
| Initial posterior packing placed; fails; taken to OR for endoscopic SPA ligation at separate session | 30905 (initial packing session) + 31241 (OR session β separate claim/encounter) |
| Initial posterior packing AND endoscopic SPA ligation performed at same operative session | Generally 31241 only β packing integral to surgical setup; however some payers may allow both; verify |
| Patient has bilateral posterior bleeds; bilateral SPA ligation performed | 31241 (bilateral by definition; check code descriptor) |
Coding Guidelines, Rules & Common Errors
Rule 1 β Anterior + Posterior Same Session = 30905 Only
When both anterior and posterior packing or cautery are performed at the same encounter, report only 30905. The anterior component (30901 or 30903) is bundled by NCCI into 30905. Never report 30901, 30903, AND 30905 together for the same session. This is the most common epistaxis coding compliance error.
Rule 2 β Initial vs. Subsequent: Date of Service Governs
30905 = first time posterior packing is placed at this episode of care. 30906 = any subsequent posterior packing placement for the same episode. If a patient has packs placed on Day 1 (30905) and the pack is replaced due to rebleed on Day 2 (30906) and replaced again on Day 3 (30906 again), each dayβs intervention is separately billable because the 0-day global period means there is no bundled post-op period. This generates legitimate multi-line billing that is fully supported.
Rule 3 β βInitialβ Does Not Reset for Readmission
If a patient has posterior packing placed during one admission (30905), is discharged, and returns within days for rebleed with new posterior packing, the second admissionβs packing is 30906 (subsequent), not a new 30905 (initial). The episode of care continues regardless of discharge. This is a judgment call β if sufficient time has passed (weeks to months) and a truly new, distinct episode of posterior epistaxis has occurred, 30905 may be appropriate; consult payer guidelines and document the clinical reasoning.
Rule 4 β Same-Day E&M Requires Modifier -25
Because 30905 has a 0-day global period, an E&M service on the same day IS separately billable, but the E&M must be distinct, separately documented, and appended with modifier -25. Without -25, the E&M will automatically deny as bundled with the procedure. Document the E&M separately from the packing note.
Rule 5 β No Modifier -50 for Posterior Codes
Unlike anterior codes (30901/30903), which are unilateral and require modifier -50 for bilateral treatment, posterior codes (30905/30906) are inherently bilateral. Never append modifier -50 to 30905 or 30906. Doing so results in duplicate payment requests and constitutes overcoding.
Rule 6 β Document That Bleeding Is Posterior in Origin
The diagnosis of posterior epistaxis must be documented in the chart. The provider must have evidence β or a clinical assessment β that the bleeding originates posterior to the posterior head of the inferior turbinate and that anterior packing alone is insufficient. Common documentation: βblood noted tracking posteriorly,β βexamination revealed posterior pharyngeal blood flow,β βanterior packing failed to control hemorrhage consistent with posterior source,β βnasopharyngoscopy confirmed posterior bleed.β Without posterior origin documentation, 30905 is not defensible on audit β default to anterior complex (30903) if documentation is ambiguous.
Rule 7 β 0-Day Global: Multi-Day Hospital E&M Fully Billable
In the inpatient setting, the treating physician can and should bill daily subsequent hospital care E&M codes (99231-99233) throughout the patientβs stay, even in the same admission where 30905 was billed. The 0-day global period means every calendar day is fully billable. This is not overcoding β it is correct application of the global period rules.
Rule 8 β Endoscope Use Determines 30905 vs. 31238
If any nasal endoscope is used, the coding decision tree is: βWas the endoscope the active treatment instrument, or just a visualization tool?β Visualization only β 30905. Active treatment (cautery delivered through or directly guided by the scope) β 31238. This single determination has a wRVU impact of approximately 1.83 units (~$59 facility). Query the provider if the operative note is ambiguous.
Anesthesia Considerations
CPT 30905 does not require general or MAC anesthesia in standard practice. The procedure is performed with:
- Topical vasoconstrictor/anesthetic β oxymetazoline or cocaine 4% on pledgets to the nasal cavity prior to packing
- Local anesthetic injection β pterygopalatine fossa block or greater palatine nerve block may be used in selected patients for posterior cautery
- Procedural sedation β used in some ED settings for anxious or uncooperative patients; this is a separate service from 30905 and is billed by the administering provider under 99151-99153 or similar codes
- For endoscopic posterior cautery (31238), the procedure may be performed under general anesthesia in the OR or under topical/local anesthesia in a procedure room depending on patient factors and setting
Note
If general or MAC anesthesia is required, the anesthesiologist bills separately under CPT 00160 (anesthesia for procedures on nose and accessory sinuses) or 00162 (radical surgery). This does not change 30905.
Coding Examples
Example 1 β Classic Posterior Packing in the Emergency Department, Initial
A 78-year-old male on warfarin presents to the ED with heavy right-sided nosebleed for 90 minutes that did not respond to anterior digital pressure or anterior gauze packing placed by triage. INR is 3.4. ENT is consulted. Nasopharyngoscopy confirms active posterior bleeding. A double-balloon epistaxis catheter (Epistat) is placed transnasally, posterior balloon inflated to 10 mL, anterior balloon inflated to 40 mL. Bleeding controlled. Patient is admitted for monitoring and INR reversal.
CPT: 30905 β Control nasal hemorrhage, posterior, initial ICD-10-CM (Principal): R04.0 β Epistaxis ICD-10-CM (Secondary): T45.515A β Adverse effect of anticoagulants, initial encounter ICD-10-CM (Secondary): Z79.01 β Long-term use of anticoagulants ICD-10-CM (Secondary):I48.11 β Longstanding persistent atrial fibrillation (underlying reason for warfarin) POA: R04.0 = Y; T45.515A = Y; I48.11 = Y Note: The INR elevation and anticoagulation should be documented and coded to support CC-level secondary diagnosis (T45.515A = CC) and accurate DRG assignment
Example 2 β Anterior Packing Attempted Then Posterior Placed Same Session
A 65-year-old female presents to an urgent care with posterior pharyngeal blood. The treating physician first places anterior bilateral Merocel sponge packs, but blood continues to track posteriorly. A Foley catheter (14 Fr) is then inserted transnasally into the nasopharynx, balloon inflated to 8 mL, secured anteriorly.
CPT: 30905 only β Do NOT also bill 30901, 30903, or both; the anterior packing attempt is bundled into 30905 ICD-10-CM: R04.0 β Epistaxis ICD-10-CM: I10 β Essential hypertension (if documented as comorbidity) Note: NCCI bundles anterior epistaxis codes into 30905 β reporting 30903 + 30905 together is a compliance violation
Example 3 β Initial Packing Day 1, Rebleed Day 2, Rebleed Day 3 (Inpatient)
A 72-year-old male with HHT (Osler-Weber-Rendu) is admitted with posterior epistaxis.
| Day | Event | CPT | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Day 1 AM | Initial posterior pack placed (Epistat) | 30905 | Initial treatment |
| Day 1 PM | Subsequent hospital E&M | 99232 | 0-day global β fully billable |
| Day 2 | Pack displaced; repositioned | 30906 | Subsequent β different from initial |
| Day 2 | Subsequent hospital E&M | 99232 | Fully billable |
| Day 3 | Pack removed; rebleed; new pack placed | 30906 | Subsequent again |
| Day 3 | Subsequent hospital E&M | 99232 | Fully billable |
ICD-10-CM (Principal): R04.0 β Epistaxis ICD-10-CM (Secondary): I78.0 β Hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia Compliance note: Each 30906 on days 2 and 3 is separately billable with no modifier needed (0-day global). Each dayβs E&M is separately billable. This is appropriate multi-visit billing, not overcoding.
Example 4 β Posterior Epistaxis Escalated to TESPAL (Two-Session Scenario)
A 68-year-old male presents to the ED on Monday with severe posterior epistaxis. Initial posterior packing is placed (30905). He is admitted. The packing continues to fail over 48 hours. On Wednesday, he is taken to the OR for endoscopic sphenopalatine artery ligation bilaterally (TESPAL, 31241). Pack is removed in the OR.
Day 1 (ED): 30905 β Initial posterior packing Day 2 (Hospital): 99232 β Subsequent inpatient E&M Day 3 (OR): 31241 β Transnasal endoscopic SPA ligation (30905 is NOT rebilled on Day 3 β it was placed 2 days prior; the OR encounter is separately billed as the TESPAL session) ICD-10-CM (both claims): R04.0 β Epistaxis ICD-10-CM (Secondary): I16.0 β Hypertensive urgency (if documented)
Example 5 β E&M + 30905 Same Day with Modifier -25
A patient presents to the ENT clinic with heavy posterior nosebleed. The physician performs a comprehensive established patient visit β reviews medical history, documents oral anticoagulation, blood pressure 190/110, evaluates severity β and then performs posterior packing with a Foley catheter.
CPT: 99215-25 β High-complexity E&M, established patient, with modifier -25 CPT: 30905 β Posterior epistaxis control, initial ICD-10-CM: R04.0 β Epistaxis ICD-10-CM: I16.0 β Hypertensive urgency ICD-10-CM: T45.515A β Adverse effect anticoagulants (if anticoagulant is the contributing factor) Key: Modifier -25 on the E&M is mandatory; without it, the E&M will deny as part of the procedure fee
Example 6 β Posterior Epistaxis Secondary to Hematologic Malignancy
A 58-year-old woman with acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) and severe thrombocytopenia (platelet count 12,000) is admitted with posterior nasal hemorrhage. ENT places bilateral posterior packs.
CPT: 30905 β Posterior epistaxis control, initial ICD-10-CM (Principal): C92.00 β Acute myeloid leukemia, not having achieved remission (drives admission β the leukemia and thrombocytopenia are the reason for the hemorrhagic episode) ICD-10-CM (Secondary): R04.0 β Epistaxis ICD-10-CM (Secondary): D69.6 β Thrombocytopenia, unspecified (or D69.3 if ITP component) MS-DRG: Governed by C92.00 as principal β MDC 17 (Myeloproliferative Diseases and Poorly Differentiated Neoplasms) β significantly higher relative weight than MDC 03 Note: Sequencing the leukemia as principal (not the epistaxis) is critical for accurate DRG assignment and appropriate risk-adjustment capture
Example 7 β Posterior Epistaxis from Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
A 52-year-old male with known nasopharyngeal carcinoma presents with posterior epistaxis. Posterior packing is placed in the ED. He is admitted for hemostasis and oncology evaluation.
CPT: 30905 β Posterior epistaxis control, initial ICD-10-CM (Principal): C11.9 β Malignant neoplasm of nasopharynx, unspecified (or specify by subsite per documentation) ICD-10-CM (Secondary): R04.0 β Epistaxis MS-DRG: 146/147/148 β ENT malignancy DRGs (MDC 03) HCC: C11.9 carries HCC weight; ensures risk-adjusted reimbursement reflects true clinical complexity
Differential Coding Summary
| Clinical Scenario | Correct Code |
|---|---|
| Posterior epistaxis, first treatment (packing or cautery) | 30905 |
| Posterior epistaxis, repeat treatment (packing failed or rebled) | 30906 |
| Anterior epistaxis, simple, first treatment | 30901 |
| Anterior epistaxis, complex, first treatment | 30903 |
| Anterior AND posterior packing, same session | 30905 only (anterior bundled) |
| Endoscopic active cautery of posterior vessel (scope = treatment instrument) | 31238 |
| Endoscopic SPA ligation | 31241 |
| Open/transantral internal maxillary artery ligation | 30920 |
| Interventional radiology embolization | 61626 |
| Packing placement AND separate, documented E&M same day | 30905 + E&M-25 |
| Multi-day inpatient packing (subsequent days) | 30906 each new packing episode + daily E&M |
| Posterior packing + modifier -50 | Incorrect β do not use -50 with posterior codes |
| No pack/cautery left in place; bleeding stopped spontaneously | E&M only (99213-99215) |
Quick Reference Summary
| Field | Detail |
|---|---|
| Code | 30905 |
| Type | CPT Procedure Code |
| Full Descriptor | Control nasal hemorrhage, posterior, with posterior nasal packs and/or cautery, any method; initial |
| Setting | ED, Hospital Inpatient, HOPD, rarely office |
| Anesthesia | Topical/local; no general anesthesia required standard |
| Global Period | 0 days β all codes in epistaxis family are 0-day global |
| wRVU | ~3.01 (facility) |
| HCC | No (procedure code); underlying diagnoses may be HCC |
| Assistant Payable | No β Medicare indicator 0 |
| Bilateral Modifier | NO β 30905 is inherently bilateral; never use modifier -50 |
| vs. 30906 | 30905 = first posterior treatment; 30906 = all subsequent treatments (note: 30906 has higher wRVU ~3.88) |
| vs. 31238 | 30905 = packing or cautery by any method; 31238 = endoscope is active treatment instrument |
| vs. 31241 (TESPAL) | 30905 = conservative packing; 31241 = endoscopic SPA ligation in OR |
| NCCI Bundle | 30901 and 30903 are BUNDLED into 30905; do not report anterior codes with 30905 |
| Multi-Day Billing | 0-day global = each dayβs packing (30906) and E&M separately billable β major revenue opportunity in inpatient setting |
| Must Document | Posterior origin of bleed (blood tracking posteriorly, pharyngeal blood, anterior packing failure) |
| Common Errors | Appending -50; billing 30901 or 30903 + 30905 together; not billing daily inpatient E&M; not appending -25 to same-day E&M; calling subsequent packing 30905 instead of 30906 |
Crystal's MCW Coder Hub